Cabral Vivian, Jemma , filed a(n) Divorce,Separation - Family case against Vivian, Brent , in the jurisdiction of Kane County, IL, . Kane County, IL Superior Courts with Tracy, Alice C presiding.
Dn - Dissolution (Without Children)
Cabral Vivian, Jemma
Bruett, Melissa - Ann E (Attorney)
Rutter, David A (Attorney)
Judge: Tracy, Alice C
Judge: Tracy, Alice C
Aug 26, 2024 | Tracy, Alice C | DC - Dissolution (with children) | DC - Dissolution (with children) | 2024-DC-000433
Aug 27, 2024 | Johnson, Keith A | DC - Dissolution (with children) | DC - Dissolution (with children) | 2024-DC-000442
Oct 21, 2019 | Johnson, Keith A | D - Dissolution (with children) | D - Dissolution (with children) | 2019-D-001269
Aug 26, 2024 | Johnson, Keith A | DN - Dissolution (without children) | DN - Dissolution (without children) | 2024-DN-000504
Aug 26, 2024 | Tracy, Alice C | DC - Dissolution (with children) | DC - Dissolution (with children) | 2024-DC-000434
Aug 28, 2024 | David, Bradley P | DN - Dissolution (without children) | DN - Dissolution (without children) | 2024-DN-000512
Aug 27, 2024 | Johnson, Keith A | DC - Dissolution (with children) | DC - Dissolution (with children) | 2024-DC-000443
FLORES VS. "DOE" Case Number: 23CV-0203461 Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal issued on July 2, 2024 to Plaintiff Eladio Flores, in pro per, for failure to timely serve the complaint and failure to timely prosecute. “The complaint must be served on all named defendants and proofs of service on those defendants must be filed with the court within 60 days after the filing of the complaint.” CRC 3.110(b). The Complaint in this matter was filed on October 19, 2023. The Court notes that an Amended Complaint was filed on April 2, 2024, however, the Amended Complaint does not add a defendant. The Court further notes that a Proof of Unsuccessful Service was filed on November 13, 2023. However, nothing in the file provides evidence of additional attempts at effecting service since the Proof of Unsuccessful Service was filed. There is still no Proof of Service of Summons on file. Plaintiff did not file a written response to the Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal. Monetary sanctions have already been imposed for failure to timely serve and it appears that Plaintiff has made no efforts to effect proper service since November of 2023. Without sufficient excuse for the delay and because previous sanctions appear to have been ineffective, the matter is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Gov. Code § § 68608(b). All future dates are vacated. The clerk is directed to close the file.
IN RE: SHAW Case Number: 24CV-0205009 Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner Lori Denise Heston, aka Laurrie Denise Rosel aka Laurrie Denise Shaw seeks to change her name to Laurrie Denise Shaw. No proof of publication has been submitted. The Court requires a Certificate of Publication from the publishing newspaper before the Petition may be granted. If the Certificate of Publication is provided, the Court intends to grant the Petition, vacate all future dates, and close the file.
IN RE: KINGSFORD TASIC Case Number: 24CV-0205102 Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner seeks to change the name of her 15 year old minor daughter. When a petition to change the name of a minor is brought by one parent only, the nonconsenting parent must be personally served with the notice of hearing or order to show cause at least 30 days before the hearing date. CCP §§ 1277(a)(4) and 415.10. If the nonconsenting parent lives out of state, service may be accomplished by certified mail. CCP § 415.40. Petitioner filed a declaration seeking to be excused from notifying the nonconsenting parent. She claims she has had no contact with the father since October of 2010, that she knows no one that he knows and that no one she knows has any knowledge of him. Although the parents have had no contact for 14 years, she makes numerous negative statements about the father’s character and criminal conduct and that she is afraid of him. These statements are not relevant to the issue of whether the father is entitled to notice. If the Court finds that notice of hearing cannot be provided personally within the state or by mailing if outside the state, the Court has discretion to find that notice be given in any manner that the Court determines is reasonably calculated to give actual notice to the nonconsenting parent. CCP § 1277(a)(4). CCP § 1277(a)(4) does not provide discretion to excuse notice entirely. The Court requires a Certificate of Publication from the publishing newspaper before the Petition may be granted. No Certification of Publication has been filed. An appearance by Petitioner is necessary on today’s calendar to discuss the Petition. Failure to appear will result in the Petition being denied and the matter being dismissed.
FLORES VS. ADKINS Case Number: 24CV-0204448 Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal issued on July 2, 2024 to Plaintiff Eladio Flores, in pro per, for failure to timely serve the complaint and failure to timely prosecute. “The complaint must be served on all named defendants and proofs of service on those defendants must be filed with the court within 60 days after the filing of the complaint.” CRC 3.110(b). The Complaint in this matter was filed on March 6, 2024. There is still no Proof of Service of Summons on file. Plaintiff did not file a response to the Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal. Monetary sanctions have already been imposed for failure to timely serve and it appears that Plaintiff has made no efforts to effect proper service. Without sufficient excuse for the delay and because previous sanctions appear to have been ineffective, the matter is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Gov. Code § § 68608(b). All future dates are vacated. The clerk is directed to close the file.
22FL46418 VASQUEZ v The matter is set for a Mandatory Settlement COLON Conference on December 4, 2024, 8:30 a.m. in Dept. 4. MSC statements are to be filed by 3:00 p.m. on November 26, 2024. Court to notify the parties. 22FL46457 ZAHNISER v Respondent is directed to file and serve his ZAHNISER Preliminary Declaration of Disclosure prior to the next Case Management Conference scheduled for January 15, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Dept. 4. 23FL46671 STEPHENS v The matter is set for a Mandatory Settlement STEPHENS Conference on December 18, 2024, 8:30 a.m. in Dept. 4. MSC statements are to be filed by 3:00 p.m. on December 10, 2024. Court to notify the parties. 23FL46821 TRAUTVETTER v The Petitioner and Respondent are both directed TRAUTVETTER to file and serve their Preliminary Declarations of Disclosure prior the next Case Management Conference scheduled for January 8, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Dept. 4. 23FL46843 PITNER v LYMAN The Complaint and Summons have been properly served and there has been no response. The petitioner is directed to have an answer, default or dismissal on file prior to the next Case Management Conference scheduled for January 15, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Dept. 4. 23FL46868 O’BRIEN v This matter is dropped from case management as SCRIVNER, JR there is a custody order in place. 23PA46593 TROUSDALE v There is no Proof of Service filed for the Petition AUTREY and Summons. The court cannot proceed with any orders until there is proper service. Petitioner is directed to have proof of service on file prior to the next Case Management Conference on February 19, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Dept. 4. 24FL47324 BORS v BORS The Petitioner and Respondent are both directed to file and serve their Preliminary Declarations of Disclosure prior the next Case Management Conference scheduled for January 8, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Dept. 4. 24FL47337 NORRIED v The Complaint and Summons have been properly NORRIED served. The petitioner is directed to have an answer, default or dismissal on file prior the next Case Management Conference scheduled for November 20, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. in Dept. 4.
FLORES VS. TAGGART Case Number: 24CV-0204446 Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal issued on July 2, 2024 to Plaintiff Eladio Flores, in pro per, for failure to timely serve the complaint and failure to timely prosecute. “The complaint must be served on all named defendants and proofs of service on those defendants must be filed with the court within 60 days after the filing of the complaint.” CRC 3.110(b). The Complaint in this matter was filed on March 6, 2024. There is still no Proof of Service of Summons on file. Plaintiff did not file a response to the Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal. Monetary sanctions have already been imposed for failure to timely serve and it appears that Plaintiff has made no efforts to effect proper service. Without sufficient excuse for the delay and because previous sanctions appear to have been ineffective, the matter is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Gov. Code § § 68608(b). All future dates are vacated. The clerk is directed to close the file.
IN RE: SHAW Case Number: 24CV-0205009 Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner Lori Denise Heston, aka Laurrie Denise Rosel aka Laurrie Denise Shaw seeks to change her name to Laurrie Denise Shaw. No proof of publication has been submitted. The Court requires a Certificate of Publication from the publishing newspaper before the Petition may be granted. If the Certificate of Publication is provided, the Court intends to grant the Petition, vacate all future dates, and close the file.